Prevalence of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Patients with Malocclusion: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

  • Saira Bilal Department of Orthodontics, Khyber College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Asma Ahmad Department of Orthodontics, Khyber College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Palwasha Gul Registrar, Department of Orthodontics, Khyber College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65293/jbkcd.v3i02.71

Keywords:

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, TMD, Malocclusion, Prevalence, Orthodontics

Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are multifactorial conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles. Malocclusion has been suggested as a contributing factor; however, its association with TMD remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of TMD among patients with malocclusion and to evaluate its association with different classes of malocclusion.

Study Design: A cross-sectional study

Place and Duration of the Study: The study was conducted over a period of one year, from January 2024 to December 2024, at the Department of Orthodontics, Khyber College of Dentistry (KCD), Peshawar.

Materials and Methods: A total of 190 patients diagnosed with malocclusion were included in this study. Malocclusion was classified according to Angle’s classification (Class I, II, and III), and Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) were assessed using standardized diagnostic criteria. Demographic variables were recorded for all participants. Associations between variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, while multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of TMD. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The overall prevalence of TMD among patients with malocclusion was 41.1% (78/190). TMD prevalence was 25.0% in Class I, 50.0% in Class II, and 57.5% in Class III malocclusion. A significant association was found between malocclusion class and TMD (χ² = 14.62, p = 0.001). Females had a higher prevalence of TMD than males (48.2% vs 30.8%, p = 0.011). Logistic regression showed that Class II (Adjusted OR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.39–6.01) and Class III malocclusion (Adjusted OR = 3.52, 95% CI: 1.54–8.05) were significant independent predictors of TMD.

Conclusion: TMD was common among patients representing at orthodontic department of KCD, Peshawar with malocclusion, particularly in Class II and III cases. Early orthodontic evaluation and interdisciplinary management may help reduce the burden of TMD.

Author Biography

Palwasha Gul, Registrar, Department of Orthodontics, Khyber College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Corresponding Author: palogul17@gmail.com

References

1. Zhai Y, Han JJ, Jung S, Kook M-S, Park H-J, Oh H-K. Changes in the temporomandibular joint clicking and pain disorders after orthognathic surgery: Comparison of orthodontics-first approach and surgery-first approach. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(9):e0238494. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238494

2. Magnusson T. Five-year longitudinal study of signs and symptoms of mandibular dysfunction in adolescents. Cranio [Internet]. 1986;4(4):338–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1986.11678162

3. Magnusson T, Carlsson GE, Egermark I. Changes in subjective symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in children and adolescents during a 10-year period. J Orofac Pain. 1993 Winter;7(1):76–82.

4. Pilley JR, Mohlin B, Shaw WC, Kingdon A. A survey of craniomandibular disorders in 500 19-year-olds. Eur J Orthod [Internet]. 1997;19(1):57–70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.1.57

5. Chisnoiu AM, Picos AM, Popa S, Chisnoiu PD, Lascu L, Picos A. Factors involved in the etiology of temporomandibular disorders: a literature review. Clujul Med [Internet]. 2015;88:473–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-485

6. Al-Moraissi EA, Perez D, Ellis E 3rd. Do patients with malocclusion have a higher prevalence of temporomandibular disorders than controls both before and after orthognathic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2017;45(10):1716–23. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.015

7. Magnusson T, Ahlborg G, Finne K, Nethander G, Svartz K. Changes in temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction after surgical correction of dentofacial anomalies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 1986;15(6):707–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80111-9

8. Egermark I, Magnusson T, Carlsson GE. A 20-year follow-up of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and malocclusions in subjects with and without orthodontic treatment in childhood. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2003;73(2):109–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2003)73<109:AYFOSA>2.0.CO;2

9. De Boever JA, Carlsson GE, Klineberg IJ. Need for occlusal therapy and prosthodontic treatment in the management of temporomandibular disorders. Part I. Occlusal interferences and occlusal adjustment. J Oral Rehabil [Internet]. 2000;27(5):367–79. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00574.x

10. Ash MM. Paradigmatic shifts in occlusion and temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil [Internet]. 2001;28(1):1–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00658.x

11. Greene CS. The etiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for treatment. J Orofac Pain. 2001 Spring;15(2):93–105; discussion 106-16.

12. Türp JC, Schindler H. The dental occlusion as a suspected cause for TMDs: epidemiological and etiological considerations: DENTAL OCCLUSION AND TMDS. J Oral Rehabil [Internet]. 2012;39(7):502–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02304.x

13. Michelotti A, Rongo R, D’Antò V, Bucci R. Occlusion, orthodontics, and temporomandibular disorders: Cutting edge of the current evidence. J World Fed Orthod [Internet]. 2020;9(3S):S15–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.08.003

14. Michelotti A, Rongo R, D’Antò V, Bucci R. Occlusion, orthodontics, and temporomandibular disorders: Cutting edge of the current evidence. J World Fed Orthod [Internet]. 2020;9(3S):S15–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.08.003

15. Shroff B. Malocclusion as a cause for temporomandibular disorders and orthodontics as a treatment. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am [Internet]. 2018;30(3):299–302. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2018.04.006

16. Kandasamy S, Rinchuse DJ, Greene CS, Johnston LE Jr. Temporomandibular disorders and orthodontics: What have we learned from 1992-2022? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2022;161(6):769–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.011

17. Gonçalves DAG, Camparis CM, Speciali JG, Franco AL, Castanharo SM, Bigal ME. Temporomandibular disorders are differentially associated with headache diagnoses: a controlled study: A controlled study. Clin J Pain [Internet]. 2011;27(7):611–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31820e12f5

18. Maixner W, Diatchenko L, Dubner R, Fillingim RB, Greenspan JD, Knott C. Orofacial pain prospective evaluation and risk assessment study-the OPPERA study. J Pain [Internet]. 2011;12(11):T4–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2011.08.002

19. Guarda-Nardini L, Piccotti F, Mogno G, Favero L, Manfredini D. Age-related differences in temporomandibular disorder diagnoses. Cranio [Internet]. 2012;30(2):103–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/crn.2012.015

20. Liu F, Steinkeler A. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Dent Clin North Am [Internet]. 2013;57(3):465–79. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2013.04.006

21. Bonjardim LR, Gaviao MBD, Carmagnani FG, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction in children with primary dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent [Internet]. 2003 Autumn;28(1):53–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.28.1.0772w75g91963670

22. Loster JE, Osiewicz MA, Groch M, Ryniewicz W, Wieczorek A. The prevalence of TMD in Polish young adults: TMD prevalence. J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2017;26(4):284–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12414

23. Tecco S, Crincoli V, Di Bisceglie B, Saccucci M, Macrĺ M, Polimeni A, et al. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders in Caucasian children and adolescents. Cranio [Internet]. 2011;29(1):71–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/crn.2011.010

24. Xie C, Lin M, Yang H, Ren A. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and its clinical signs in Chinese students, 1979-2017: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Dis [Internet]. 2019;25(7):1697–706. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13016

25. Ebrahimi M, Dashti H, Mehrabkhani M, Arghavani M, Daneshvar-Mozafari A. Temporomandibular disorders and related factors in a group of Iranian adolescents: A cross-sectional survey. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects [Internet]. 2011 Autumn;5(4):123–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2011.028

26. Habib SR, Al Rifaiy MQ, Awan KH, Alsaif A, Alshalan A, Altokais Y. Prevalence and severity of temporomandibular disorders among university students in Riyadh. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2015;27(3):125–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.009

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

1.
Bilal S, Ahmad A, Gul P. Prevalence of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders in Patients with Malocclusion: A Cross-Sectional Study. JBKCD [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 24 [cited 2026 Apr. 29];3(2):26-33. Available from: https://jbkcd.bkcd.edu.pk/index.php/website/article/view/71

Issue

Section

Original Articles