Radiographic Assessment of Impacted Canines in Orthodontic Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65293/jbkcd.v3i02.70Keywords:
Impacted Canine, Prevalence, Orthodontic Patients, Panoramic Radiograph, Malocclusion, Logistic RegressionAbstract
Background: Impacted canines represent one of the most common eruption disturbances encountered in orthodontic practice, often leading to significant functional and aesthetic complications if left untreated. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of impacted canines and to assess their association with demographic variables and occlusal risk factors.
Study Design: A Retrospective study.
Place and Duration of the Study: The study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan from January 2023 to December 2024.
Materials and Methods: A total of 170 orthodontic patients were included in this study. Panoramic radiographs were evaluated to identify impacted canines and to assess their position, angulation, depth, sector classification, and associated root resorption. Demographic data and Angle’s classification of malocclusion were also recorded. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify predictors of canine impaction. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Impacted canines were found in 15.3% (26/170) of patients, with a total of 30 impacted teeth identified. Most impactions occurred in the maxilla (93.3%), were unilateral (84.6%), and palatal in position (60%). Moderate angulation (30°–45°) and middle-third root depth were the most frequent radiographic findings. Root resorption of adjacent lateral incisors was observed in 20% of cases. Logistic regression analysis showed that Angle’s Class II malocclusion was significantly associated with canine impaction (Adjusted OR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.01–5.28; p = 0.047). Gender, age, and residence were not significant predictors.
Conclusion: Approximately one in six orthodontic patients had impacted canines, predominantly in the maxilla and palatal region. Class II malocclusion was identified as a significant risk factor. Early radiographic screening in orthodontic patients, particularly those with Class II malocclusion, is recommended for timely intervention and prevention of complications.
References
1. Dalessandri D, Parrini S, Rubiano R, Gallone D, Migliorati M. Impacted and transmigrant mandibular canines: incidence, aetiology and treatment-a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39(2):161–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw027
2. Grisar K, Piccart F, Al-Rimawi AS, Basso I, Politis C, Jacobs R. Three-dimensional position of impacted maxillary canines: Prevalence, associated pathology and introduction to a new classification system. Clin Exp Dent Res [Internet]. 2019;5(1):19–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.151
3. Jain S, Debbarma S. Patterns and prevalence of canine anomalies in orthodontic patients. Med Pharm Rep [Internet]. 2019;92(1):72–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-907
4. Kamiloglu B, Kelahmet U. Prevalence of impacted and transmigrated canine teeth in a Cypriote orthodontic population in the Northern Cyprus area. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 2014;7(1):346. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-346
5. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2008;133(4):515–23. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.046
6. Verma N, Valiathan A. Prevalence and distribution of maxillary canine impaction in orthodontic patients. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent [Internet]. 2006;4(8):18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2319-5932.194994
7. Alhabeebi II, Foda MY, El-Din El-Sayed EM, Mohamed El Dawlatly M. Prevalence of impacted canine among adult orthodontic patients: A retrospective study. Act Scie Dental [Internet]. 2022;33–41. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.31080/asds.2022.06.1274
8. Umaiyal MP, Rengalakshmi S, Ramamurthy J. Prevalence of canine impaction in Chennai population. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2021;9(1):8-14.
9. Shanmugam J, Aravind Kumar S, Suresh V. Assessment of prevalence and gender predilection of canine impaction in Chennai population. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2020 Nov 25;7(11):1058-62.
10. Verma N, Valiathan A. Prevalence and distribution of maxillary canine impaction in orthodontic patients. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent [Internet]. 2006;4(8):18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2319-5932.194994
11. Jain S, Debbarma S. Patterns and prevalence of canine anomalies in orthodontic patients. Med Pharm Rep [Internet]. 2019;92(1):72–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-907
12. Alshawy E. The prevalence and categories of impacted maxillary canines: A radiographic study. Cureus [Internet]. 2023;15(6):e40070. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40070
13. Gupta SK, Halwai HK, Shrestha R. Prevalence of maxillary impacted canine among orthodontic patients of Universal College of medical sciences, college of Dental Surgery, Bhairahawa, Nepal. J Univers Coll Med Sci [Internet]. 2022;10(01):50–2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v10i01.47238
14. Baidas LF, Alshihah N, Alabdulaly R, Mutaieb S. Severity and treatment difficulty of impacted maxillary canine among orthodontic patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2022;19(17):10680. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710680
15. Almarhoumi AA, Okashah YA, Alrehaili MA, Alrehaili KN. Frequency and pattern of impacted Canines in Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional radiographic study: A cross-sectional radiographic study. J Orthod Sci [Internet]. 2022;11(1):15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_188_21
16. Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA, Arriola-Guillén LE, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Ruíz-Mora GA, Janson G, Cevidanes L, et al. Three-dimensional changes in root angulation of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines after orthodontic traction: A retrospective before and after study. Int Orthod [Internet]. 2021;19(2):216–27. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.04.003
17. Alfaleh W, Al Thobiani S. Evaluation of impacted maxillary canine position using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2021;33(7):738–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.014
18. Kumar S, Jayaswal P, Pentapati KC, Valiathan A, Kotak N. Investigation of the transmigrated canine in an orthodontic patient population. J Orthod [Internet]. 2012;39(2):89–94; quiz 137. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000010
19. Sharma G, Nagpal A. A study of transmigrated canine in an Indian population. Int Sch Res Notices [Internet]. 2014;2014:756516. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/756516
20. Aktan AM, Kara S, Akgünlü F, Malkoç S. The incidence of canine transmigration and tooth impaction in a Turkish subpopulation. Eur J Orthod [Internet]. 2010;32(5):575–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp151
21. Becker A. General principles related to the diagnosis and treatment of impacted teeth. Becker A, editor. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2022.
22. Khan MA, Qureshi NR, Rahman SU. Frequency of impacted maxillary canines among orthodontic patients in a Pakistani population. Pak Oral Dent J. 2019;39(3):254–7.
23. Piya A, Shrestha BV, Khapung A, Bhattarai P. Prevalence and pattern of canine impaction and its associated anomalies among orthodontic patients attending tertiary care dental hospital in Kathmandu. Orthod J Nepal [Internet]. 2020;10(1):6–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v10i1.30996
24. Hussain U, Rahman N, Khan A. Radiographic evaluation of impacted maxillary canines among orthodontic patients in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pak Oral Dent J. 2022;42(1):45–9.
25. Siotou K, Kouskouki M-P, Christopoulou I, Tsolakis AI, Tsolakis IA. Frequency and local etiological factors of impaction of permanent teeth among 1400 patients in a Greek population. Dent J (Basel) [Internet]. 2022;10(8):150. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080150
26. Martínez-Rodríguez C, Martínez-Rodríguez N, Alamán-Fernández JM, Ruiz-Sáenz PL, Santos-Marino J, Martínez-González JM, et al. Dental transmigration: An observational retrospective study OF52 mandibular canines. Biology (Basel) [Internet]. 2022;11(12):1751. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11121751
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Bacha Khan College of Dentistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
