Comparative Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Sodium Bicarbonate Dentifrices in Plaque and Gingival Inflammation Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Rabia Syed Senior Dental Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ayub College of Dentistry, Abbottabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Ruqqia Jehan Assistant Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College CIMS Dental College, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Imtiaz Ali Assistant Professor, Department of OMFS, Saidu College of Dentistry, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65293/jbkcd.v2i02.26

Keywords:

Chlorhexidine, Sodium Bicarbonate, Plaque Index, Gingival Inflammation, Bleeding on Probing, Oral Hygiene, Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of chlorhexidine versus sodium bicarbonate dentifrices for reducing plaque and gingival inflammation over 6 weeks in orthodontic patients.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 120 participants were allocated 1:1 to chlorhexidine or sodium bicarbonate dentifrice. Participants brushed twice daily for 6 weeks using standardized toothbrushes and the Charters’ technique. Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. Adverse events and adherence were recorded. A linear mixed-effects model assessed group, time, and group×time effects; results are presented with p-values.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvements from baseline. Compared with sodium bicarbonate, chlorhexidine produced greater reductions in PI (≈42.9% vs. 30.0%), GI (≈44.4% vs. 23.5%), and BOP (≈59.8% vs. 39.3%) (all p<0.05). Taste alteration and tooth staining occurred more frequently with chlorhexidine. Subgroup analyses indicated attenuated improvements among smokers compared with non-smokers.

Conclusion: Over 6 weeks, chlorhexidine dentifrice demonstrated superior antiplaque and anti-gingivitis efficacy but with more adverse effects, whereas sodium bicarbonate offered fewer side effects and moderate efficacy. Smoking status negatively impacted outcomes in both groups. Long-term studies are warranted to evaluate sustained benefits and tolerability.

References

1. Claire R, Gluud C, Berlin I, Coleman T, Leonardi-Bee J. Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention [Internet]. Research Square. 2020. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-35669/v1

2. Chan JSK, Harky A. Trial sequential analysis in meta-analyses: A clinically oriented approach with real-world example. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2021;162(1):167–73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.063

3. Chapple ILC, Van der Weijden F, Doerfer C, Herrera D, Shapira L, Polak D, et al. Primary prevention of periodontitis: managing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol [Internet]. 2015;42 Suppl 16:S71-6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12366

4. Escribano M, Figuero E, Martín C, Tobías A, Serrano J, Roldán S, et al. Efficacy of adjunctive anti-plaque chemical agents: a systematic review and network meta-analyses of the Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index. J Clin Periodontol [Internet]. 2016;43(12):1059–73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12616

5. Valkenburg C, Kashmour Y, Dao A, Fridus Van der Weijden GA, Slot DE. The efficacy of baking soda dentifrice in controlling plaque and gingivitis: A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg [Internet]. 2019;17(2):99–116. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12390

6. Madeswaran S, Jayachandran S. Sodium bicarbonate: A review and its uses in dentistry. Indian J Dent Res [Internet]. 2018;29(5):672–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_30_17

7. Bosma M-L, Milleman KR, Akwagyiram I, Targett D, Milleman JL. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of sodium bicarbonate dentifrices in a single brushing clinical model. BDJ Open [Internet]. 2018;4(1):17037. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-018-0003-7

8. Akwagyiram I, Butler A, Maclure R, Colgan P, Yan N, Bosma ML. A randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a 67% sodium bicarbonate-containing dentifrice on 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash tooth staining. BMC Oral Health. 2024;16(1).

9. Akwagyiram I, Amini P, Bosma M-L, Wang N, Gallob J. Efficacy and tolerability of sodium bicarbonate toothpaste in subjects with gingivitis: A 6-month randomized controlled study. Oral Health Prev Dent [Internet]. 2018;16(5):401–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a41362

10. Afshari Z, Yaghini J, Naseri R. Levels of smoking and Peri‑implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2022;22(3):101721. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101721

11. Clark-Perry D, Van der Weijden GA, Berkhout WER, Wang T, Levin L, Slot DE. Accuracy of clinical and radiographic measurements of periodontal infrabony defects of diagnostic test accuracy (dta) studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2022;22(1):101665. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101665

12. Adly MS, Adly AS, Rasheed AM, Adly AS. Can combining low-level laser therapy with computer-guided flapless piezosurgical osteotomy achieve a painless implant surgery? Findings of split-mouth randomized controlled trial. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(3).

13. Afrashtehfar KI, Jurado CA, Wang H-L. For Peri-implant soft tissue augmentation, soft tissue substitutes may improve patients’ surgical and postoperative experience compared to autogenous grafts. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2023;23(1):101835. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101835

14. Salam AE, Khashab E. Zygomatic implants may improve quality of life and satisfaction in patients with atrophied maxilla. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(2).

15. Rams TE, Slots J. Antimicrobial chemotherapy for recalcitrant severe human periodontitis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12.

16. Limeback H, Enax J, Meyer F. Improving oral health with fluoride-free calcium-phosphate-based biomimetic toothpastes: An update of the clinical evidence. Biomimetics (Basel) [Internet]. 2023;8(4):331. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8040331

17. Axe A, Patel N, Qaqish J, Ling MR, Araga M, Parkinson C, et al. Efficacy of an experimental toothpaste containing sodium bicarbonate, sodium hyaluronate and sodium fluoride on gingivitis. BMC Oral Health [Internet]. 2024;24(1):209. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03981-9

18. Duque Duque A, Padilla C, Almeida A, Jaramillo M, Romanelli RA. Lafaurie Villamil GI. Strategies for the prevention of periodontal disease and its impact on general health: Latin America and the Caribbean Consensus 2024. Braz Oral Res. 2024;38(1).

19. Abrahamsen S, Koldsland OC, Preus HR. The anti-plaque effect of high-concentration sodium bicarbonate dentifrice on plaque formation and gingival inflammation, irrespective of individual polishing technique and plaque quality. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1).

20. Ersoy SC, Abdelhady W, Li L, Chambers HF, Xiong YQ, Bayer AS. Bicarbonate resensitization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [Internet]. 2019;63(7). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00496-19

21. Taschieri S, Tumedei M, Francetti L, Corbella S, Del Fabbro M. Efficacy of 67% sodium bicarbonate toothpaste for plaque and gingivitis control: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2022;22(2):101709. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101709

22. John MT, Michalowicz BS, Kotsakis GA, Chu H. Network meta-analysis of studies included in the Clinical Practice Guideline on the nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol [Internet]. 2017;44(6):603–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12726

23. Leucht S, Chaimani A, Cipriani AS, Davis JM, Furukawa TA, Salanti G. Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci [Internet]. 2016;266(6):477–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-016-0715-4

24. Haryani IGAD, Wedagama DM, Hervina H. The effectiveness of rinsing with celery leafs (Apium graveolens l.) extract 10% and chlorhexidine gluconate 0.1% to accelerate post-scaling gingivitis healing. ODONTO Dent J [Internet]. 2022;9:51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/odj.9.0.51-56

25. Abid M, Rauf R, Siddiq A, Mazhar S, Zaidi HA, Zafar U. Comparison of the side effects of chlorhexidine and honey mouthwash among dental patients: a randomized controlled trial. Pak J Health Sci. 2024;6(1).

26. Roopavathi KM, Gopal SV, Pushpalatha G, Antharasanahalli DBBVR, Madhura S. Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available toothpastes-an in vitro study. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2015;7(3).

27. Shibly O, Ciancio SG, Kazmierczak M, Cohen RE, Mather ML, Ho A, et al. Clinical evaluation of the effect of a hydrogen peroxide mouth rinse, sodium bicarbonate dentifrice, and mouth moisturizer on oral health. J Clin Dent. 1997;8(5):145–9.

28. Akhtar Z, Syed K, Farooq A, Muneeb A, Ayub Z, Rahim A. Comparative efficacy of chlorhexidine and sodium bicarbonate dentifrices in plaque and gingival inflammation reduction: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of khyber college of dentistry. 2023;13(04):19–25. https://nja.pastic.gov.pk/KCD/index.php/KCD/article/view/87

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Syed R, Jehan R, Ali I. Comparative Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Sodium Bicarbonate Dentifrices in Plaque and Gingival Inflammation Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JBKCD [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2026 Apr. 19];2(02):47-54. Available from: https://jbkcd.bkcd.edu.pk/index.php/website/article/view/26

Issue

Section

Original Articles