Management of Hot Tooth in Dental Practice: Awareness and Strategies Assessed through a Cross-Sectional Survey

Syed Imran Gillani; Syed Muhammad Junaid

doi:10.65293/jbkcd.v2i02.23

Authors

Syed Imran Gillani Department of Community & Preventive Dentistry, Sardar Begum Dental College & Hospital, Gandhara University, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Syed Muhammad Junaid Assistant Professor, Medical Education/IHPER, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65293/jbkcd.v2i02.23

Keywords:

Hot Tooth, Dental Anesthesia, Endodontic Pain, Anesthetic Failure, Dental Practitioners, Pain Management

Abstract

Objective: To assess awareness, knowledge, and management strategies for handling hot tooth cases among dental practitioners.
Study Design: A cross-sectional descriptive study
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Endodontics , at Sardar Begum Dental College & Hospital, Gandhara University, Peshawar, from June 2023 to December 2023.
Materials and Methods: A survey was administered to 180 dental practitioners, including general dentists, endodontists, and oral surgeons. The questionnaire collected data on demographics, knowledge of the hot tooth phenomenon, anesthetic techniques, management approaches, and practitioners’ confidence in handling such cases. Regression analysis identified factors influencing confidence levels.
Results: Of the respondents, 83.3% were familiar with the hot tooth phenomenon, but only 66.7% understood its pathophysiology. The inferior alveolar nerve block (44.4%) was the most commonly used technique, yet 72.2% reported difficulty achieving effective anesthesia. Alternative procedures, such as intraosseous injections, were utilized by 55.6% to enhance anesthetic success. Regression analysis revealed that years of practice (β = 0.12, p = 0.005), endodontic specialty (β = 0.25, p = 0.001), and prior awareness of hot tooth (β = 0.30, p< 0.001) were significant predictors of confidence (R² = 0.65, p< 0.001).
Conclusion: Most dental practitioners recognize the hot tooth phenomenon, but many lack comprehensive knowledge of its management. Endodontists and experienced practitioners demonstrate higher confidence, emphasizing the need for enhanced training in anesthetic techniques and alternative management methods.

Author Biography

Syed Muhammad Junaid, Assistant Professor, Medical Education/IHPER, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Corresponding Author: muhammadjunaid.ihpe@kmu.edu.pk

References

1. Manta K, Dabarakis N, Lillis T, Fotopoulos I. Anesthetic efficacy of buffered 4% articaine for mandibular first molar infiltration: a crossover clinical trial. J Dent Anesth Pain Med [Internet]. 2023;23(3):135–41. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.3.135

2. Vatankhah M, Zargar N, Naseri M, Sadeghi S, Baghban AA, Dianat O, et al. Primary and supplementary anesthetic efficacy of a modified two-step buccal infiltration of 4% articaine in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2023;28(1):33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05417-0

3. Kung J, McDonagh M, Sedgley CM. Does articaine provide an advantage over lidocaine in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod [Internet]. 2015;41(11):1784–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.001

4. Dias-Junior Lc De L, Bezerra AP, Schuldt D, Kuntze MM, De Luca Canto G, Garcia L. Effectiveness of different anesthetic methods for mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(12):6477–500.

5. Rogers BS, Botero TM, McDonald NJ, Gardner RJ, Peters MC. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Endod [Internet]. 2014;40(6):753–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.022

6. Afkhami F, Pirmoazen S, Ardestani A, Fard MJK. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block and inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal or lingual infiltration using articaine in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a preliminary prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial. Quintessence Int [Internet]. 2021;52(9):820–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b1864321

7. Shapiro MR, McDonald NJ, Gardner RJ, Peters MC, Botero TM. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in supplemental infiltration for mandibular first versus second molars with irreversible pulpitis: A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Endod [Internet]. 2018;44(4):523–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.003

8. Almadhoon HW, Abuiriban RW, Almassri H, Al-Hamed FS. Efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2022;22(2):101712. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101712

9. Hamza EM, Aziz AE, Obeid TM. The influence of intraoral cryotherapy on postoperative pain and substance P in symptomatic apical periodontitis: randomized clinical study. ci Rep. 2024;14.

10. Romeiro K, Gominho LF, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr. Postoperative pain in oncological patients subjected to nonsurgical root canal treatment: a prospective case-control study. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2024;28(9):472. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05866-1

11. Iranmanesh P, Khazaei S, Nili M, Saatchi M, Aggarwal V, Kolahi J, et al. Anaesthetic efficacy of incorporating different additives into lidocaine for the inferior alveolar nerve block: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Int Endod J [Internet]. 2022;55(7):732–47. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13746

12. Aksoy F, Ege B, Tosun S. The effect of pre-operative submucosal administration of dexamethasone, tramadol, articaine on the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block on mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Int Endod J [Internet]. 2021;54(11):1982–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13604

13. Saber SM, Hashem AA, Khalil DM, Pirani C, Ordinola-Zapata R. Efficacy of four local anaesthesia protocols for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J [Internet]. 2022;55(3):219–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13667

14. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. J Endod [Internet]. 2012;38(4):421–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006

15. Parente SA, Anderson RW, Herman WW, Kimbrough WF, Weller RN. Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection for teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod [Internet]. 1998;24(12):826–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80011-3

16. Nusstein J, Kennedy S, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J. Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental X-tip intraosseous injection in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod [Internet]. 2003;29(11):724–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200311000-00010

17. Sixou JL, Marie-Cousin A, Huet A, Hingant B, Robert JC. Pain assessment by children and adolescents during intraosseous anesthesia using a computerized system (QuickSleeperTM). Int J Paediatr Dent. 2024;19(5):360–6.

18. Farhad A, Razavian H, Shafiee M. Effect of intraosseous injection versus inferior alveolar nerve block as primary pulpal anesthesia of mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Vol. 76. ActaOdontol Scand; 2025.

19. Karapinar-Kazandag M, Tanalp J, Ersev H. Effect of premedication on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: A systematic review of the literature. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2019;2019:6587429. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6587429

20. Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J Dent Res [Internet]. 2020;99(5):481–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034520914246

21. Hassan S, Ahmed A, Saqib W, Abulhamael AM, Habib SR, Javed MQ. Comparison of efficacy of lidocaine and Articaine as inferior alveolar nerve blocking agents in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: Randomized controlled trial. Medicina (Kaunas) [Internet]. 2023;59(10). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101840

22. Zain M, Rehman Khattak SU, Sikandar H, Shah SA, Fayyaz. Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine primary buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in symptomatic mandibular first molar teeth. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak [Internet]. 2016;26(1):4–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/01.2016/JCPSP.0408

23. Ali A, Shah FA, Nawaz S, Junaid SM. Anesthetic efficacy of articainebuccal infiltration compared to lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in symptomatic mandibular premolars: a randomized control trial. J Rehman Med Inst. 2024;10(2):3–5.

24. Sattar R. Efficacy of 4% articainevs 2% lidocaine in mandibular irreversible pulpitis: Pakistani study. J Health Welfare Clin Res. 2025;9(1):15–20.